Speaking of Furbearer Management and
Conservation
Despite what activists say...
The fur industry is all about conservation
From the column by Gary Ball, The Sudbury Star
It's fascinating to see the anti-fur campaigns
heating up again.
That's because you can bet your bottom dollar that
every time a crew like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) trots
out another gullible, attractive young woman to pose in the nude saying: "I'd
rather go naked than wear fur," things are going well for Canada's fur industry.
The first fur auction of the current season
(December) saw the gavel dropped on about $2.7 million worth of wild fur at the
Fur Harvesters Auction Inc. sale in North Bay.
With three more sales scheduled for this season,
Mark Downey, CEO of Fur Harvesters, expects sales totals to hit $12 million, up
$2 million from last year.
Canada's first exports may well have been dried
cod taken off the shores of Newfoundland by Basque fishermen long before
Christopher Columbus and John Cabot, but the fur trade and its export record
date back something like 400 to 500 years. And there are accurate records of
Canada's fur harvest over that period of time.
What those records show is that fur, for the
better part of five centuries, has been a solid trade commodity, one of the
building blocks of the Canadian economy. They show that fur prices have always
moved in cycles, driven by supply, demand and the whims of fashion.
More interestingly, of
course, is the fact that fur is a renewable resource. Trappers, working their
traplines like farms, cropping and selling only surplus animals are able to
continue to harvest fur century after century.
The cyclical nature of fur prices means that
trappers and furriers live through boom and bust market cycles. But these
cycles are driven by demand, not by dwindling numbers of furbearers. Canada's
furbearer population is strong and stable, thanks in part to it's contribution
to the economy. Trappers are quick to defend their livelihoods.
Enlightened self-interest and a love of the outdoors makes Canadian trappers
front-runners in sound conservation practices.
Trappers can point
with pride to traplines which produce as much fur today as they did a century or
more ago, despite booming human populations in Ontario. Quite an accomplishment.
And, as long as they have an economic stake in the outcome, trappers will
continue to protect the resource. Indeed, many continue to trap and act as
stewards of their trapping zones when fur prices drop and it actually costs them
money to trap.
The fur industry as a whole, trapping wild fur and
farming species such as fox and mink, is worth an estimated $800 million and
provides about 75,000 jobs.
Each time fur prices dip in Canada, the anti-fur
people like PETA jump on the bandwagon, claiming that their antics are
destroying the market for fur, by making people ashamed of wearing fur garments.
That's what's behind the "I'd rather go naked" nonsense.
But those claims just aren't true. It is market
forces that drive fur prices.
And, as the economies of eastern Europe and Asia
strengthen, most traders expect demand for top quality wild fur to increase.
Asia, particularly China, is a huge enough market that it could have a
tremendous long-term effect on demand for wild fur.
Personally, I firmly
believe that anything that is good for the wild fur industry is good news for
wild furbearers in Ontario and in Canada. Trappers have long been leaders in
conservation, in harvesting their traplines sustainable, to ensure that
populations remain stable.
Every time I think
about trapping I am taken back in memory to the Kearney trapline (along the
western edge of Algonquin Park) of the late Ralph Bice.
Ralph, a master story-teller and superb trapper,
first began to harvest fur in the early 1900's, before the Wright brothers
succeeded in flying their fragile airplane at Kitty Hawk. He was still trapping
and spinning yarns as late as 1985, long after the first man walked on the moon.
Expect for a brief
stint in an auto plant during the Second World War (Ralph was too young for the
First World War and a little too old for the second), he lived his entire life
as a trapper and guide. He raised his family which include teachers and judges,
on the harvest from his trapline.
Today, another trapper
is taking fur from Ralph's old trapline. It is producing as much wild fur as it
did 50 or 75 years ago. If present and future holders of that trapline remain
true to their principles of sound conservation, it is likely that Ralph's
trapline will continue to produce a renewable harvest of fur well into the next
century.
That's what I think of
when I think of conservation and sustainable development: Ralph Bice and his
trapline, the resource he held in trust for future generations.
Gary Ball
January 10, 2002
Read Gary every Thursday in the
Sudbury Star